Skip to main content

PROOF!


Term1, 2018 starts with a new Mantle of the Expert! 

I am collaborating with a science teacher for this selected offered to Year 9 students called PROOF! This selected (option class) runs for one term with two sessions of 100x minutes per week. It is based around forensic science - something I know nothing about - and students will learn how to dust for fingerprints, analyse different fibers, analyse information and make conclusions about various crimes that are presented to them. The teacher I am working with experience MOTE last year when I was working on a connected class (check out my previous blogs for my reflections on that) and he is keen to try it again on a smaller scale and now that he has some understanding of the ways of working.

In our first class, the students were met by the science teacher taking on a frozen effigy. He was sitting on a stool, with a box beside him (they could see a document with fingerprints on it), looking seriously at a piece of paper he was holding and he had a 'VISITOR' badge on. Learners were asked to give their observations; "he looks concerned" "he is visiting someone" "he looks professional". I then gave them a letter from the 'Police' (we made up our own logo - I advise not to use real businesses, names or logos!). They read the letter and then I asked them, what else do you know? "He is here for our help" "a crime has been committed" "his name is Pavan". The learners were then told they could ask him three questions, so as a group they discussed what they needed to know from Pavan and decided on three questions. This gave them further insight into the character and the crime that had been committed.

From here, the learners then had to create a timeline, analyse physical evidence and decide on motive to give back to Pavan in order to keep the case open. The group decided that they needed to split into three groups to do this, and that they needed to keep communication open between the groups as they found out important information. It was also suggested they have a company meeting at the end of the day to ensure that all the information is shared across the company. Each group split off to work in different spaces, but there was lots of movement between groups with questioning and justifying when they thought they had found the culprit.

This hook for me went quite well. There was engagement and discussion about the company, and some initial set up, such as the company meeting is a fantastic starting point.

When I started to build belief in the following class, thing started coming undone a bit.

I warmed up with some drama games based around accepting and offering ideas. I had great engagement from the girls, but the boys were a bit reluctant and bit chatty. Maybe I needed to adjust my games when this started, however I carried on wondering if they were testing the boundaries a bit as it was only class two.

In small groups, we listed characteristics of a detective and then did the 'handshake clumps' to decide what our top characteristics as a group were. We decided we: think outside the box, are intelligent, problem solvers, are persuasive, focused and we are sneaky and stealthy. 
From these, I reminded the company that we have a long history and reminded them of some of our successes - again, the girls were really eager, nodding their heads, agreeing, some saying that was a hard case. The boys however, couldn't remember and swore that we didn't. I set up the task of creating some of our interviews about our success before I had a quiet word to the boys about accepting the world we are creating. They nodded and created an interview with Batman. After they performed, I summarized their performance by saying we are a company who work with many agents of good, we have a strong sense of justice. However, I felt disheartened by the lack of engagement. It's been a long time since I have come up against such resistance.

Because of the way I was feeling, I deviated from my original plan - which was whole group work around our name, and mapping our space. We had a brief discussion before the performances about our name, there were three being floated around and I was going to come back to this to lock it down and then move onto mapping. However, because of how I was feeling - I moved them into the classroom space and had them individually create a logo or advertising poster for the company using a name they liked from the performances. Now that I have done this, I regret it and I'm not sure how to bounce back. I need to find a way to bring all these elements together in the company because by setting this task, I have added more investment and attachment to the name each learner choose.

My challenges for next week are capturing the engagement and belief of the boys, and finding a way to keep building our team and company for all the learners.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection on attempt number one

We have wrapped up our first attempt at Mantle of the Expert as connected teaching team. There have been successes, as well as some points of frustration and uncertainty. To summarize our MOTE; Hook: interned messes up, put the display put in order to send off Company Creation: created office space, wrote about our first day on the job, created artifacts of the company (logo, business cards, vehicle design, website) History of the Company: advertisements, interviews from our successful history  Mini commission: write lesson plans to accompany the display sent away Commission One: create a road show that explores continental drift. We trailed our ideas on local years 6-8 students and gained their feedback. We used this to do some data analysis.  Commission Two: Create a bus stop poster that is informative and interactive showing Polynesian Journey to NZ  Wrap up: imagine you are at the bus stop, what is your reaction to this poster. Write a short social media ...
3 comments
Read more

Where did the last two weeks go?

It has been two more weeks in class - four classes, so I am behind in my reflection posts. Last week, Mr Science set up a training crime scene. Using the skills they had learned through the fingerprinting professional development, two groups had to collect evidence from the crime scene. Before being allowed to enter past the caution tape, they needed to discuss and come up with plan, which each group did eagerly. There was a table of resources for them outside the crime scene. They discussed they needed their lab coats and name tags, they needed the shoe covers so they would not contaminate the scene. They needed to photograph where all the evidence was. They needed to document and log each piece of evidence. I was impressed with the level of seriousness with which most of the class approached the situation. They were focused and very aware of following some clear, agreed upon procedures. They collected their evidence and sent it away to the labs for testing. The next day, they ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Problems and solutions...

It's been awhile since my last post, and I think that it is due to a departure from Mantle as of late within class. We have been having some struggles with maintaining a MOTE approach with 60 students, and with 3 teachers who have never taught in a MOTE before. It has been a big learning curve for all of us. The newest commission that the company received was to create bus stop posters from the Pasifika Komiti that were interactive, engaging and informative about 'Journey's to New Zealand'. The company underwent some professional development to help build their knowledge before creating the posters. In hindsight, I think that that the 'Professional Development' days that were set up to assist in the development of the posters were too teacher driven in terms of the content. There was no questioning of students in terms of what they already knew / wanted to know / questions they had for the development of their poster. I think that if we had have done that, ...
Post a Comment
Read more